OK, I admit it. I have been trained from a very early age to respond to guilt. And so, after “yesterday’s entry”:http://yergler.net/blog/archives/2005/02/22/what-you-want-to-eat, I decided that complaining about “NewsFire”:http://newsfirerss.com/ is an indefensible position, especially considering how much I’ve used the application. So this morning I shelled out and registered.
But let me clarify one point: I still feel a little duped. So in the interest of constructive criticism (and so I know what to do in the event *I* actually want to charge for an app), I’ve done some thinking about why. Keep in mind that these reasons are firmly rooted in ignorance: I found “NewsFire”:http://newsfirerss.com/ via the “OS X RSS Showdown”:http://www.drunkenblog.com/drunkenblog-archives/000337.html, never really bothered to read much of the background, and still haven’t looked at so much as a FAQ on the site.
So the two thoughts are:
* When you download the free version, there didn’t seem to be any mention of the restrictions. I’ve noticed this is true of lots of shareware sites. All I want to do is make an informed decision about what I need: a statement of what’s missing, or (even better) a pretty grid comparing “lite” to “full” would make the process much easier.
* It wasn’t clear to me that the author eventually intended to charge for the application when I downloaded the beta.
Damn, and here I thought there was something insightful lying around somewhere.