<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ccPublisher, Python and XML</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yergler.net/blog/2005/09/08/ccpublisher-python-and-xml/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yergler.net/blog/2005/09/08/ccpublisher-python-and-xml/</link>
	<description>Because eventually I&#039;ll be right. Theoretically.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:14:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Yergler</title>
		<link>http://yergler.net/blog/2005/09/08/ccpublisher-python-and-xml/comment-page-1/#comment-24595</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Yergler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 23:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yergler.net/blog/?p=326#comment-24595</guid>
		<description>PJE and others have done measurements on the penalty (or lack thereof).  If I recall correctly, the short answer is that the scan happens once at start-up, and in many cases is anything but pathological. In my opinion Eggs are an important Python development, as they&#039;ve brought package metadata with them. Even if you want to deal with sdists (which is often preferable to me for pure Python code), having that metadata is a great improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PJE and others have done measurements on the penalty (or lack thereof).  If I recall correctly, the short answer is that the scan happens once at start-up, and in many cases is anything but pathological. In my opinion Eggs are an important Python development, as they&#8217;ve brought package metadata with them. Even if you want to deal with sdists (which is often preferable to me for pure Python code), having that metadata is a great improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guzel Tangam Gururrla sunarrr</title>
		<link>http://yergler.net/blog/2005/09/08/ccpublisher-python-and-xml/comment-page-1/#comment-23631</link>
		<dc:creator>Guzel Tangam Gururrla sunarrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 13:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yergler.net/blog/?p=326#comment-23631</guid>
		<description>Has anyone considered that the whole idea of eggs as deployment is a bit of a mess as well? I haven’t profiled, but a lot more work must be happening to traverse more numerous, deep directory structures, many of whom are mirrors of each other, confusing the always-beautiful packages-are-directories meme that makes Python so easy to deal with at a large scale, or should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone considered that the whole idea of eggs as deployment is a bit of a mess as well? I haven’t profiled, but a lot more work must be happening to traverse more numerous, deep directory structures, many of whom are mirrors of each other, confusing the always-beautiful packages-are-directories meme that makes Python so easy to deal with at a large scale, or should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

