Struggle as you may to define Web 2.0, the folks over at Tagly have figured it out.
It’s all about ripping off Flickr‘s visual identity.
Briefly
- "First thing this morning, I'm gonna fuck up my local source tree." Check. 4 days ago
- On my way to Las Vegas with the guys. What could possibly go wrong? 1 week ago
- "Your direct interactions are nice, but you leak epithets *continuously*." 1 week ago
- Eventbrite engineering off site. Aka daytime drinking. 2 weeks ago
- Attn: @senatorreid @chuckschumer @mcconnellpress We need you to stand for free speech on the Internet and kill #PIPA http://t.co/jGZxvQep 4 weeks ago
Recent Posts
See Also
- Blog Archives
- Microblog (identi.ca)
- Photos (flickr)
- CC Labs blog
Cringe[ly]
Not real[ly]. You would need to look at the rest of the Num[ly], Doc[ly], Rap[ly], and Tag[ly] domains to see that our branding pattern is unique. Besides the blue used in Tagly is Docly blue not Flickr blue and the font is different and there’s a tag thingy hanging from the logo. We do, however, appreciate being compared to Flickr. Thanks!
Fair enough; if you look at the other sites (http://numly.com, http://raply.com, http://docly.com) you’ll see that there’s a clear, consistent branding pattern and font, with the colors being varied between properties. And after a closer look, it *is* apparent that its not *exactly* Flickr blue… but, well, yeah… first thing that came to mind. I guess I should have some coffee before reading email in the morning.